Set program lifecycle state. Changes update the client view instantly.
💾 Backup & Restore
Export current portal state (client portfolios, program states, building type) as a JSON snapshot. Import a snapshot to roll back. Use before deploying changes.
Snapshot includes: all client portfolios from localStorage, current scenario URL params, program lifecycle states, building type, memory edits, and saved configurations.
Snapshot does NOT include: dashboard code, deployed files, or external app data (HubSpot, Asana, etc.).
🎬 Test As — Scenario Presets
Switch the demo to a different state, city, building type, and spend without editing the URL. Updates all benchmarks, BPS heat map, opportunity values, and program cards instantly.
Current scenario:—
Profile:—
📋 Manual Override
Fine-tune individual fields without picking a preset.
⚡ Energy Procurement
Trigger: state_deregulated
☀ Community Solar
Trigger: state_solar
🔎 Utility Cost Recovery
Trigger: spend_over_50k
📉 Demand Response
Trigger: peak_demand
🎁 Rebates & Incentives
Trigger: aging_equipment
🌍 Renewable Energy Credits
Trigger: always
🏛 Building Performance Standards
Trigger: bps_city
🌿 ESG & Sustainability Strategy
Trigger: large_portfolio
💡 Energy Efficiency — EaaS
Trigger: aging_equipment
🏢 Property Type
Sets the building category used for EUI, ENERGY STAR, cost-per-sqft, and carbon benchmarks. Sourced against EPA Aug 2024 reference table.
Currently: —
Median Site EUI:— kBtu/sqft
ENERGY STAR Score:—
Source:—
📤 Upload Portfolio
Add to Portfolio appends the uploaded rows to this client's existing locations. Replace Portfolio wipes the existing list first — use only for a clean re-import. Download a blank template if you don't have one yet.
Add a single location to this client's portfolio map. For bulk uploads, use the spreadsheet importer. New entries sync to the Overview map automatically.
Cost & Revenue Programs
4 Programs
⚡
Energy Procurement
Deregulated Supply Management
Savings
15–30%
Client Cost
$0
Term
12–36 mo
DeregulatedNo CapExQuarterly Reviews
▶ Case Study: Signia by Hilton — San Jose, CA
Signia by Hilton — San Jose, CA
STS restructured energy procurement for the 805-room hotel, locking in a competitive fixed-rate contract.
✓ $47,000 Annual Savings
☀
Community Solar
Renewable Bill Credits
Savings
~10%
Client Cost
$0
Carbon
High
No Exit FeesESG CreditMonthly
▶ Case Study: Community Solar — Placeholder
Community Solar — Placeholder
STS will add a community solar case study specific to your building type and region.
🔎
Utility Cost Recovery
Forensic Bill Audit
Avg Recovery
$10K+
Win Rate
90%
Fee
Contingency
All 50 StatesZero RiskE·G·W·T
▶ Case Study: Foot Locker — Multi-Site Portfolio
Foot Locker — Multi-Site Portfolio
STS audited 47 retail locations across 12 states, identifying billing errors and tariff misclassifications spanning 36 months.
✓ $38,000 Recovered
📉
Demand Response
Load Curtailment Revenue
Min Load
10 kW
Revenue
Annual
Auto
Available
Incentive ProgramsSeasonalReal-Time
▶ Case Study: Demand Response — Placeholder
Demand Response — Placeholder
Multi-site commercial portfolios typically generate $15–40K annually in DR revenue.
Clean Energy
2 Programs
🎁
Rebates & Incentives
Mid-Stream & Utility Programs
Applied At
Point of Sale
Admin
STS Handles
Scope
Multi-System
LEDHVACRefrigerationControls
▶ Case Study: Rebates — Placeholder
Rebates — Placeholder
STS has secured millions in mid-stream rebates across retail, hospitality, and commercial portfolios.
🌍
Renewable Energy Credits
RECs & Green Tariffs
Type
RECs/VPPAs
Verification
WECC/NEPOOL
Reporting
CDP/GRI
Scope 2CDP ReportingSBTi Aligned
▶ Case Study: RECs — Placeholder
RECs — Placeholder
Renewable Energy Credit procurement case study coming soon.
Sustainability & Compliance
2 Programs
🏛
Building Performance Standards
BPS Compliance & Benchmarking
Fine Exposure
Significant
Deadline
2024–2030
Reporting
Annual
NYC LL97BEPSBERDOENERGY STAR
▶ Case Study: BPS Compliance — Placeholder
BPS Compliance — Placeholder
Upload your building footprint to receive a preliminary BPS exposure assessment.
🌿
ESG & Sustainability Strategy
Reporting & Carbon Roadmap
Frameworks
CDP/GRI/SBTi
GHG Scopes
1+2+3
Audience
Board/Investors
GHG InventoryCDPENERGY STARSBTi
▶ Case Study: ESG Strategy — Placeholder
ESG Strategy — Placeholder
Board-ready ESG reporting, GHG inventory, and Science-Based Targets alignment.
Energy Efficiency
1 Program
💡
Energy Efficiency — EaaS
Efficiency-as-a-Service
Model
EaaS
Scope
Portfolio
Payback
From Savings
LEDHVACControlsNo CapEx
▶ Case Study: Signia by Hilton — LED & Controls
Signia by Hilton — LED & Controls
Bluetooth mesh LED retrofit. 80% energy savings. 7-month payback on ballrooms and meeting spaces.
— annual potential, calculated from your spend & sq ft
Procurement Optimization
—
12% typical via competitive RFP
Efficiency to Best-in-Class
—
Operational + capital improvements
Conservative Total
—
% of current annual spend
Estimated Payback
<12 mo
Procurement gains immediate
SOURCE Procurement floor (12%) reflects typical savings via competitive RFP across deregulated markets · Efficiency upside calculated as gap to ENERGY STAR top-quartile EUI
Calculations include CBECS census-region climate adjustments and size-band corrections (CBECS Table C4). Updated quarterly when source agencies publish revisions. Source files available on request.
⚡ Total Addressable Opportunity
$—
— annualized · across all eligible programs
Conservative-end estimates derived from your portfolio profile and verified industry rates. Sources cited per program below.
One-time Recoverable
$—
BPS Risk Avoided
$—
⚠Building Performance Standards Exposure
— jurisdictions with active ordinances
● Portfolio Performance
COUNT BY
📊 Total Portfolio
—%
—
0 participating0 eligible
Upload portfolio to begin
⚡ Electric Accounts
—%
—
0 participating0 eligible
No electric accounts loaded
🔥 Gas Accounts
—%
—
0 participating0 eligible
No gas accounts loaded
📍 Top Region
—%
—
0 participating0 eligible
No regional data
Regional Breakdown
Program Scorecard
9 Programs · sorted by impact
12-Month Roadmap
3 Phases
Months 1–3
Discovery & Recovery
Forensic bill audits, contract review, procurement RFP, and ENERGY STAR baseline.
Months 4–6
Strategy & Compliance
Carbon roadmap, BPS plan, DR enrollment, community solar onboarding.
In 14 states, commercial electric customers can bypass their utility's default "price-to-compare" rate by contracting directly with a licensed retail supplier. Default rates flow through real-time wholesale capacity costs; competitive contracts hedge that exposure by locking pricing at fixed terms.
In PJM territory, the recent capacity auction cleared at $329.17/MW-day — the FERC ceiling — driven by data-center load growth that's added 5,400+ MW to forecasted demand. Those costs flow directly into utility default service tariffs in the form of higher "price-to-compare" rates. PA, NJ, MD, OH, and DE customers all saw double-digit default rate increases entering 2026.
Competitive supply doesn't eliminate capacity exposure entirely, but it lets a portfolio fix supply pricing at a known number for 12-36 months — converting volatile flow-through costs into a budgetable line item. Suppliers compete on margin, contract terms, and renewable content. STS runs the RFP across licensed suppliers and validates bid math against the existing tariff.
Authorizes STS to pull your interval data and run the RFP. Five minutes of your time.
⚡
STS runs the RFP
We bid your load across licensed suppliers — fixed, indexed, and load-following products all priced simultaneously.
📊
Review offers side by side
STS presents a full comparison vs. your current rate. You choose or walk away. No obligation.
✅
Lock in your rate
Contract activated at your next meter read. STS monitors quarterly and manages renewal.
By the Numbers
+22%
Recent PJM default rate increase from 2024-2026
SOURCE — PJM 2026/27 BRA
2.5¢/kWh
Typical spread between utility default and competitive RFP
SOURCE — EIA Form 861
12-36 mo
Standard supply contract term in deregulated markets
SOURCE — Industry
Field Study
1.5M sqft healthcare portfolio · PJM PECO zone
Ran a 24-month competitive RFP in Q3 2024. Three suppliers bid; the winner cleared 2.5¢/kWh below the utility default rate. Annualized savings: ~$487K. Contract was extended in October 2025 to lock supply pricing before the 2026/27 capacity-driven default rate increase of +22%.
In 14 states, commercial electric customers can bypass their utility's default "price-to-compare" rate by contracting directly with a licensed retail supplier. Default rates flow through real-time wholesale capacity costs; competitive contracts hedge that exposure by locking pricing at fixed terms.
In PJM territory, the recent capacity auction cleared at $329.17/MW-day — the FERC ceiling — driven by data-center load growth that's added 5,400+ MW to forecasted demand. Those costs flow directly into utility default service tariffs in the form of higher "price-to-compare" rates. PA, NJ, MD, OH, and DE customers all saw double-digit default rate increases entering 2026.
Competitive supply doesn't eliminate capacity exposure entirely, but it lets a portfolio fix supply pricing at a known number for 12-36 months — converting volatile flow-through costs into a budgetable line item. Suppliers compete on margin, contract terms, and renewable content. STS runs the RFP across licensed suppliers and validates bid math against the existing tariff.
Authorizes STS to pull your interval data and run the RFP. Five minutes of your time.
⚡
STS runs the RFP
We bid your load across licensed suppliers — fixed, indexed, and load-following products all priced simultaneously.
📊
Review offers side by side
STS presents a full comparison vs. your current rate. You choose or walk away. No obligation.
✅
Lock in your rate
Contract activated at your next meter read. STS monitors quarterly and manages renewal.
By the Numbers
+22%
Recent PJM default rate increase from 2024-2026
SOURCE — PJM 2026/27 BRA
2.5¢/kWh
Typical spread between utility default and competitive RFP
SOURCE — EIA Form 861
12-36 mo
Standard supply contract term in deregulated markets
SOURCE — Industry
Field Study
1.5M sqft healthcare portfolio · PJM PECO zone
Ran a 24-month competitive RFP in Q3 2024. Three suppliers bid; the winner cleared 2.5¢/kWh below the utility default rate. Annualized savings: ~$487K. Contract was extended in October 2025 to lock supply pricing before the 2026/27 capacity-driven default rate increase of +22%.
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
STS completed a competitive RFP across 8 licensed suppliers. GDF Suez Energy selected at $0.0812/kWh — 22% below the prior ConEd tariff of $0.1041/kWh. 24-month fixed-rate contract active since October 2025.
Current Performance
Savings tracking within 2% of projection. Fixed-rate contract fully protects against market price increases through the remainder of the term.
Next Steps
Quarterly review Q1 2026. Renewal window opens July 2027 — STS will run a new RFP 90 days before expiration.
Deregulated Supply Management · Active
Energy Procurement — Active
Month 5 of 24 · GDF Suez Energy · Fixed Rate
Savings This Month
$6,200
Cumulative Savings
$30,400
Full-Term Projection
$72,000
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
STS completed a competitive RFP across 8 licensed suppliers. GDF Suez Energy selected at $0.0812/kWh — 22% below the prior ConEd tariff of $0.1041/kWh. 24-month fixed-rate contract active since October 2025.
Current Performance
Savings tracking within 2% of projection. Fixed-rate contract fully protects against market price increases through the remainder of the term.
Next Steps
Quarterly review Q1 2026. Renewal window opens July 2027 — STS will run a new RFP 90 days before expiration.
Deregulated Supply Management · Results Ready
Energy Procurement — Results Ready
Month 5 of 24 · GDF Suez Energy · Fixed Rate
Savings This Month
$6,200
Cumulative Savings
$30,400
Full-Term Projection
$72,000
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
STS completed a competitive RFP across 8 licensed suppliers. GDF Suez Energy selected at $0.0812/kWh — 22% below the prior ConEd tariff of $0.1041/kWh. 24-month fixed-rate contract active since October 2025.
Current Performance
Savings tracking within 2% of projection. Fixed-rate contract fully protects against market price increases through the remainder of the term.
Next Steps
Quarterly review Q1 2026. Renewal window opens July 2027 — STS will run a new RFP 90 days before expiration.
Solar & Community Solar
On-site versus off-site: how the math compares.
Community solar lets businesses subscribe to nearby utility-scale projects and receive bill credits — no rooftop modification, no capex, no operational obligations. 24 states plus DC have authorized programs. Subscribers typically save 5-20% off retail rates, with credits applied via Virtual Net Metering (VNM) directly on monthly bills.
Where rooftop or carport installation is feasible, on-site PV stacks multiple incentives. The federal Investment Tax Credit provides a 30% credit on system cost; MACRS depreciation accelerates tax deductions over 5 years; in some states SREC revenue creates an ongoing income stream. NREL's PVWatts modeler estimates production by exact location — the Northeast averages ~1,200 kWh/kW-yr, California's Central Valley reaches ~1,750 kWh/kW-yr.
The decision between subscription and ownership turns on three factors: roof condition (age, structure, shading), tax appetite (ITC and depreciation only matter if the entity has tax liability to offset), and utility policy (community solar availability, net metering caps, demand-charge structures). Multi-site portfolios most often end up with a mix — community solar where on-site is impractical, ownership where the math is strongest.
We identify available community solar projects in ConEd and National Grid territory and match your accounts.
📄
Execute one agreement
Sign a single subscription authorization. STS handles all utility coordination and paperwork.
💰
Credits appear on your bill
Monthly credits applied directly to your utility statement — guaranteed at 10% below your retail rate.
🌱
Carbon credit for ESG
Each kWh of community solar reduces your Scope 2 emissions. Verifiable for CDP and ESG reporting.
By the Numbers
5-20%
Subscriber bill discount range vs retail (community solar)
SOURCE — CESA / NREL
24 + DC
States with active community solar programs
SOURCE — DSIRE
1,200 kWh/kW
NREL PVWatts modeled output for Northeast deployments
SOURCE — NREL
Field Study
12-store retail chain · MA
Subscribed three sites to community solar projects via the SMART program — saving $42K/yr with zero rooftop modifications and zero capex. The remaining 9 stores were assessed for on-site PV; four penciled at under 7-year simple payback after stacking ITC, MACRS, and SREC revenue. Three of those four were greenlit for Q1 2026 commissioning.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why two solar paths exist for two very different economics.
✓
Community solar substitutes operating expense: bill credits replace utility charges at 5–20% discount, no capital deployed.
✓
On-site PV deploys capital: ITC, MACRS depreciation, and (in some states) SREC revenue stack against system cost.
✓
Subscriber agreements transfer no ownership, no construction risk, no maintenance — just monthly fees and offsetting credits.
✓
On-site economics depend heavily on tax position: ITC and depreciation only matter if there's tax liability to offset.
✓
Net metering rules vary by state; this single variable can swing on-site payback by 2–3 years.
Your Savings Estimate
8 eligible sites
Eligible Sites8 of 12
Est. Annual Credits$18,000/yr
Guaranteed Rate~10% below utility
Credits guaranteed at a discount to your utility rate for the subscription term.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Community solar lets businesses subscribe to nearby utility-scale projects and receive bill credits — no rooftop modification, no capex, no operational obligations. 24 states plus DC have authorized programs. Subscribers typically save 5-20% off retail rates, with credits applied via Virtual Net Metering (VNM) directly on monthly bills.
Where rooftop or carport installation is feasible, on-site PV stacks multiple incentives. The federal Investment Tax Credit provides a 30% credit on system cost; MACRS depreciation accelerates tax deductions over 5 years; in some states SREC revenue creates an ongoing income stream. NREL's PVWatts modeler estimates production by exact location — the Northeast averages ~1,200 kWh/kW-yr, California's Central Valley reaches ~1,750 kWh/kW-yr.
The decision between subscription and ownership turns on three factors: roof condition (age, structure, shading), tax appetite (ITC and depreciation only matter if the entity has tax liability to offset), and utility policy (community solar availability, net metering caps, demand-charge structures). Multi-site portfolios most often end up with a mix — community solar where on-site is impractical, ownership where the math is strongest.
We identify available community solar projects in ConEd and National Grid territory and match your accounts.
📄
Execute one agreement
Sign a single subscription authorization. STS handles all utility coordination and paperwork.
💰
Credits appear on your bill
Monthly credits applied directly to your utility statement — guaranteed at 10% below your retail rate.
🌱
Carbon credit for ESG
Each kWh of community solar reduces your Scope 2 emissions. Verifiable for CDP and ESG reporting.
By the Numbers
5-20%
Subscriber bill discount range vs retail (community solar)
SOURCE — CESA / NREL
24 + DC
States with active community solar programs
SOURCE — DSIRE
1,200 kWh/kW
NREL PVWatts modeled output for Northeast deployments
SOURCE — NREL
Field Study
12-store retail chain · MA
Subscribed three sites to community solar projects via the SMART program — saving $42K/yr with zero rooftop modifications and zero capex. The remaining 9 stores were assessed for on-site PV; four penciled at under 7-year simple payback after stacking ITC, MACRS, and SREC revenue. Three of those four were greenlit for Q1 2026 commissioning.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why two solar paths exist for two very different economics.
✓
Community solar substitutes operating expense: bill credits replace utility charges at 5–20% discount, no capital deployed.
✓
On-site PV deploys capital: ITC, MACRS depreciation, and (in some states) SREC revenue stack against system cost.
✓
Subscriber agreements transfer no ownership, no construction risk, no maintenance — just monthly fees and offsetting credits.
✓
On-site economics depend heavily on tax position: ITC and depreciation only matter if there's tax liability to offset.
✓
Net metering rules vary by state; this single variable can swing on-site payback by 2–3 years.
Your Savings Estimate
8 eligible sites
Eligible Sites8 of 12
Est. Annual Credits$18,000/yr
Guaranteed Rate~10% below utility
Credits guaranteed at a discount to your utility rate for the subscription term.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Month 7 of 24 · Hudson Valley Solar · ConEd & National Grid
Credits This Month
$1,480
Credits Year to Date
$10,360
Projected Annual
$18,000
Program Phase
Enrolled
⏳
Program Enrolled — Data Populating
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
All 8 eligible sites enrolled in Hudson Valley Solar in April 2025. 840 kW aggregate subscription. 10% guaranteed discount below ConEd retail rate locked for 24-month term.
Current Performance
Credits tracking at $1,480/month — within 3% of the $18,000 annual projection. All 8 sites receiving credits without interruption. RECs generated monthly for CDP Scope 2 reporting.
Next Steps
4 remaining sites eligible for enrollment. STS can add them to the current subscription. Renewal window opens January 2027.
Renewable Bill Credits · Active
Community Solar — Active
Month 7 of 24 · Hudson Valley Solar · ConEd & National Grid
Credits This Month
$1,480
Credits Year to Date
$10,360
Projected Annual
$18,000
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
All 8 eligible sites enrolled in Hudson Valley Solar in April 2025. 840 kW aggregate subscription. 10% guaranteed discount below ConEd retail rate locked for 24-month term.
Current Performance
Credits tracking at $1,480/month — within 3% of the $18,000 annual projection. All 8 sites receiving credits without interruption. RECs generated monthly for CDP Scope 2 reporting.
Next Steps
4 remaining sites eligible for enrollment. STS can add them to the current subscription. Renewal window opens January 2027.
Renewable Bill Credits · Results Ready
Community Solar — Results Ready
Month 7 of 24 · Hudson Valley Solar · ConEd & National Grid
Credits This Month
$1,480
Credits Year to Date
$10,360
Projected Annual
$18,000
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
All 8 eligible sites enrolled in Hudson Valley Solar in April 2025. 840 kW aggregate subscription. 10% guaranteed discount below ConEd retail rate locked for 24-month term.
Current Performance
Credits tracking at $1,480/month — within 3% of the $18,000 annual projection. All 8 sites receiving credits without interruption. RECs generated monthly for CDP Scope 2 reporting.
Next Steps
4 remaining sites eligible for enrollment. STS can add them to the current subscription. Renewal window opens January 2027.
Utility Cost Recovery
Why commercial utility bills are wrong 1–3% of the time.
Industry research consistently finds error rates between 1% and 3% of commercial utility billing — meaning a $2.4M annual spend likely contains $24K-$72K of recoverable overcharges in any given year. Most errors fall into a handful of recurring categories that show up across utility territories and tariff structures.
Demand ratchet errors are the largest single source: when a tariff applies a minimum billable demand based on a high prior month, accounting systems often miss the reset window. Tariff misclassification occurs when a commercial site is billed on a general-service tariff when its actual usage profile qualifies for industrial rates (or vice versa). Missed sales-tax exemptions affect manufacturing and certain industrial uses. Meter multiplier errors are rarer but produce the largest single recoveries when found.
Most state Public Utility Commissions allow retrospective refunds for 2-4 years from the discovery date. The audit process involves pulling meter and billing records back through the lookback window, recalculating bills against the correct tariff, and filing a recovery claim through the utility's billing dispute channel. STS audit engagements are contingency-based: a percentage of recovered funds, no recovery means no fee.
Provide 24–36 months of utility bills and a one-page authorization. STS handles all utility communications from there.
🔎
Forensic audit
STS auditors review every charge — tariff classifications, demand ratchets, capacity tags, taxes — line by line.
📋
Claims filed
STS files formal refund claims with each utility. We manage all correspondence, appeals, and follow-up.
💰
Credits applied
Refunds appear as bill credits or direct checks. STS tracks every dollar and delivers a full recovery report.
By the Numbers
1-3%
Industry estimate of commercial billing errors as % of spend
SOURCE — DOE billing audit studies
2-4 yrs
Typical state PUC retroactive refund lookback window
SOURCE — NARUC
Contingency
STS audit fee structure — no recovery, no charge
SOURCE — STS engagement model
Field Study
156-store retailer · National footprint
Audit recovered $1.84M in retroactive utility refunds across 31 months. Recovery breakdown: 62% from demand ratchet errors at 47 sites, 24% from tariff misclassification (general service vs industrial), and 14% from missed sales-tax exemptions on commercially-coded usage. Average recovery per audited site: $11,800.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why recoverable errors compound over multi-year lookback windows.
✓
Demand ratchets create stair-step billing minimums that persist 11+ months after a single high-demand event.
✓
Tariff misclassification is the largest dollar-value error category — sites with seasonal usage often qualify for industrial rates.
✓
Sales-tax exemptions for manufacturing require a state-issued exemption certificate; many sites never file.
✓
State PUC retrospective windows range from 2 years (most states) to 4 years; errors found later are unrecoverable.
✓
Audit findings file through the utility's billing dispute process (60–180 days); recovered amounts credit to the next bill.
Your Recovery Estimate
Based on your portfolio
Annual Spend$2,400,000
Utility TerritoryConEd / National Grid
Estimated Recovery$10,000–$22,000
Estimate based on portfolio size and utility mix. Auditors confirm exact figure within 2–4 weeks of receiving your bills.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Why commercial utility bills are wrong 1–3% of the time.
Industry research consistently finds error rates between 1% and 3% of commercial utility billing — meaning a $2.4M annual spend likely contains $24K-$72K of recoverable overcharges in any given year. Most errors fall into a handful of recurring categories that show up across utility territories and tariff structures.
Demand ratchet errors are the largest single source: when a tariff applies a minimum billable demand based on a high prior month, accounting systems often miss the reset window. Tariff misclassification occurs when a commercial site is billed on a general-service tariff when its actual usage profile qualifies for industrial rates (or vice versa). Missed sales-tax exemptions affect manufacturing and certain industrial uses. Meter multiplier errors are rarer but produce the largest single recoveries when found.
Most state Public Utility Commissions allow retrospective refunds for 2-4 years from the discovery date. The audit process involves pulling meter and billing records back through the lookback window, recalculating bills against the correct tariff, and filing a recovery claim through the utility's billing dispute channel. STS audit engagements are contingency-based: a percentage of recovered funds, no recovery means no fee.
Provide 24–36 months of utility bills and a one-page authorization. STS handles all utility communications from there.
🔎
Forensic audit
STS auditors review every charge — tariff classifications, demand ratchets, capacity tags, taxes — line by line.
📋
Claims filed
STS files formal refund claims with each utility. We manage all correspondence, appeals, and follow-up.
💰
Credits applied
Refunds appear as bill credits or direct checks. STS tracks every dollar and delivers a full recovery report.
By the Numbers
1-3%
Industry estimate of commercial billing errors as % of spend
SOURCE — DOE billing audit studies
2-4 yrs
Typical state PUC retroactive refund lookback window
SOURCE — NARUC
Contingency
STS audit fee structure — no recovery, no charge
SOURCE — STS engagement model
Field Study
156-store retailer · National footprint
Audit recovered $1.84M in retroactive utility refunds across 31 months. Recovery breakdown: 62% from demand ratchet errors at 47 sites, 24% from tariff misclassification (general service vs industrial), and 14% from missed sales-tax exemptions on commercially-coded usage. Average recovery per audited site: $11,800.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why recoverable errors compound over multi-year lookback windows.
✓
Demand ratchets create stair-step billing minimums that persist 11+ months after a single high-demand event.
✓
Tariff misclassification is the largest dollar-value error category — sites with seasonal usage often qualify for industrial rates.
✓
Sales-tax exemptions for manufacturing require a state-issued exemption certificate; many sites never file.
✓
State PUC retrospective windows range from 2 years (most states) to 4 years; errors found later are unrecoverable.
✓
Audit findings file through the utility's billing dispute process (60–180 days); recovered amounts credit to the next bill.
Your Recovery Estimate
Based on your portfolio
Annual Spend$2,400,000
Utility TerritoryConEd / National Grid
Estimated Recovery$10,000–$22,000
Estimate based on portfolio size and utility mix. Auditors confirm exact figure within 2–4 weeks of receiving your bills.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Audit Complete · Filings Active · ConEd & National Grid
Recovered to Date
$6,200
Filings Pending
$8,100
Total Identified
$14,300
Program Phase
Enrolled
⏳
Program Enrolled — Data Populating
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
STS completed a 36-month forensic audit across all 12 sites, identifying $14,300 in overcharges. ConEd demand ratchet error recovered across 3 accounts (18 months). National Grid tariff misclassification and water meter errors filed.
Current Performance
ConEd credits applied April–May 2025. National Grid and water claims in standard utility review — expected within 30 days. Total client share upon full recovery: $8,580.
Next Steps
Pending recoveries expected within 30 days. STS continues monthly bill review at no additional cost for 36 months post-audit.
Forensic Bill Audit · Active
Utility Cost Recovery — Active
Audit Complete · Filings Active · ConEd & National Grid
Recovered to Date
$6,200
Filings Pending
$8,100
Total Identified
$14,300
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
STS completed a 36-month forensic audit across all 12 sites, identifying $14,300 in overcharges. ConEd demand ratchet error recovered across 3 accounts (18 months). National Grid tariff misclassification and water meter errors filed.
Current Performance
ConEd credits applied April–May 2025. National Grid and water claims in standard utility review — expected within 30 days. Total client share upon full recovery: $8,580.
Next Steps
Pending recoveries expected within 30 days. STS continues monthly bill review at no additional cost for 36 months post-audit.
Forensic Bill Audit · Results Ready
Utility Cost Recovery — Results Ready
Audit Complete · Filings Active · ConEd & National Grid
Recovered to Date
$6,200
Filings Pending
$8,100
Total Identified
$14,300
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
STS completed a 36-month forensic audit across all 12 sites, identifying $14,300 in overcharges. ConEd demand ratchet error recovered across 3 accounts (18 months). National Grid tariff misclassification and water meter errors filed.
Current Performance
ConEd credits applied April–May 2025. National Grid and water claims in standard utility review — expected within 30 days. Total client share upon full recovery: $8,580.
Next Steps
Pending recoveries expected within 30 days. STS continues monthly bill review at no additional cost for 36 months post-audit.
Demand Response
How grid operators pay for committed load reduction.
ISO/RTO capacity markets compensate businesses for committing to reduce consumption during grid emergencies. Events are infrequent (typically under 10 per year) and brief (under 4 hours each), but the standby capacity payments are substantial — and they've grown more than 10× since 2024 in PJM.
A facility participates by registering a guaranteed kW reduction with an ISO-approved aggregator. When the grid operator calls an event — usually with 2-hour advance notice — participating sites curtail their committed load by deferring HVAC, dimming non-critical lighting, or shifting flexible processes. Performance is measured against a customer-baseline-load formula and settled monthly.
Capacity payments are made for availability, not just performance — revenue accrues whether or not events are called. PJM 2026/27 cleared at $329.17/MW-day RTO-wide. NYISO Zone J consistently trades highest in the country. ERCOT's Emergency Response Service operates differently (energy-only payments). Programs and rates vary materially by ISO.
Typical PJM Capacity Performance curtailment frequency
SOURCE — PJM operations data
<4 hrs
Typical event duration; advance notice ≥2 hours
SOURCE — PJM tariff
Field Study
12-site cold storage operator · PJM Zone 5
Committed 4.2 MW of curtailable load into the Capacity Performance product. Trailing-18-month revenue: $762K. Three events were called during this window — each lasted under 2 hours, with internal asset temperatures deviating less than 0.4°F. The operator deferred two compressor banks during events while running ride-through cooling reserves.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why ISO capacity markets pay even when nothing happens.
✓
Capacity payments compensate the right to call the resource — revenue accrues whether or not events are dispatched.
✓
Performance is measured against a customer-baseline-load formula derived from prior weekday averages.
✓
The 4-hour event window is binding; resources able to sustain longer durations earn higher capacity ratings.
✓
Failing to perform triggers under-performance charges, typically covered by the aggregator's insurance.
✓
PJM Capacity Performance is the strictest tier — it clears highest, but with binding annual obligations.
Your Revenue Estimate
Based on peak demand
Annual Spend$2,400,000
Est. Peak Demand~2,400 kW
Est. Annual Revenue$15,000–$40,000
Revenue estimate based on your utility territory and load profile. Actual payment confirmed after first DR season.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
How grid operators pay for committed load reduction.
ISO/RTO capacity markets compensate businesses for committing to reduce consumption during grid emergencies. Events are infrequent (typically under 10 per year) and brief (under 4 hours each), but the standby capacity payments are substantial — and they've grown more than 10× since 2024 in PJM.
A facility participates by registering a guaranteed kW reduction with an ISO-approved aggregator. When the grid operator calls an event — usually with 2-hour advance notice — participating sites curtail their committed load by deferring HVAC, dimming non-critical lighting, or shifting flexible processes. Performance is measured against a customer-baseline-load formula and settled monthly.
Capacity payments are made for availability, not just performance — revenue accrues whether or not events are called. PJM 2026/27 cleared at $329.17/MW-day RTO-wide. NYISO Zone J consistently trades highest in the country. ERCOT's Emergency Response Service operates differently (energy-only payments). Programs and rates vary materially by ISO.
Typical PJM Capacity Performance curtailment frequency
SOURCE — PJM operations data
<4 hrs
Typical event duration; advance notice ≥2 hours
SOURCE — PJM tariff
Field Study
12-site cold storage operator · PJM Zone 5
Committed 4.2 MW of curtailable load into the Capacity Performance product. Trailing-18-month revenue: $762K. Three events were called during this window — each lasted under 2 hours, with internal asset temperatures deviating less than 0.4°F. The operator deferred two compressor banks during events while running ride-through cooling reserves.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why ISO capacity markets pay even when nothing happens.
✓
Capacity payments compensate the right to call the resource — revenue accrues whether or not events are dispatched.
✓
Performance is measured against a customer-baseline-load formula derived from prior weekday averages.
✓
The 4-hour event window is binding; resources able to sustain longer durations earn higher capacity ratings.
✓
Failing to perform triggers under-performance charges, typically covered by the aggregator's insurance.
✓
PJM Capacity Performance is the strictest tier — it clears highest, but with binding annual obligations.
Your Revenue Estimate
Based on peak demand
Annual Spend$2,400,000
Est. Peak Demand~2,400 kW
Est. Annual Revenue$15,000–$40,000
Revenue estimate based on your utility territory and load profile. Actual payment confirmed after first DR season.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
Enrolled in NYISO ICAP and ConEd BQDM programs. Automated controllers installed at 3 sites. Three events completed: Jul 15 ($2,800), Aug 2 ($2,900), Aug 19 ($2,700). All responded automatically with no staff action.
Current Performance
Average curtailment 18% below baseline — above the 15% commitment threshold. Full-season projection of $22,000 remains on track.
Next Steps
Season payment issued November 2025. Season 2 enrollment Spring 2026. Additional sites may qualify for expanded enrollment.
Load Curtailment Revenue · Active
Demand Response — Active
Season 1 Active · NYISO ICAP + ConEd BQDM
Events Completed
3 of ~12
Revenue Earned
$8,400
Projected Season
$22,000
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
Enrolled in NYISO ICAP and ConEd BQDM programs. Automated controllers installed at 3 sites. Three events completed: Jul 15 ($2,800), Aug 2 ($2,900), Aug 19 ($2,700). All responded automatically with no staff action.
Current Performance
Average curtailment 18% below baseline — above the 15% commitment threshold. Full-season projection of $22,000 remains on track.
Next Steps
Season payment issued November 2025. Season 2 enrollment Spring 2026. Additional sites may qualify for expanded enrollment.
Load Curtailment Revenue · Results Ready
Demand Response — Results Ready
Season 1 Active · NYISO ICAP + ConEd BQDM
Events Completed
3 of ~12
Revenue Earned
$8,400
Projected Season
$22,000
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
Enrolled in NYISO ICAP and ConEd BQDM programs. Automated controllers installed at 3 sites. Three events completed: Jul 15 ($2,800), Aug 2 ($2,900), Aug 19 ($2,700). All responded automatically with no staff action.
Current Performance
Average curtailment 18% below baseline — above the 15% commitment threshold. Full-season projection of $22,000 remains on track.
Next Steps
Season payment issued November 2025. Season 2 enrollment Spring 2026. Additional sites may qualify for expanded enrollment.
Rebates & Incentives
Where the rebate dollars actually live.
DSIRE — the federally-funded incentive database maintained at NCSU — tracks 2,800+ active commercial utility programs nationwide, plus federal IRA tax credits and state-level incentives. Programs vary widely by utility territory and run on hard annual budgets that deplete partway through each fiscal year.
Most rebates fall into three families: prescriptive (fixed $/unit for specific equipment like LED tubes or VFD drives), custom (engineered savings calculations for non-standard projects), and performance-based (paid against measured savings over multiple years). Mass Save in Massachusetts pays up to $1.40/sqft across full-stack retrofits. PA Act 129 funds programs through PECO, Duquesne, PPL, and FirstEnergy at slightly lower density.
Federal incentives stack on top of utility rebates without offset in most cases. The IRA's §179D commercial buildings deduction allows up to $5/sqft for qualifying retrofits; §48 ITC provides a 30% credit for solar and storage. Pre-approval before equipment purchase is required by most utility programs — a common reason captures fail.
STS maps every available utility, state, and federal incentive to your equipment profile and planned upgrades.
📋
Pre-approvals filed
STS files pre-approval applications before purchase to lock in incentive rates.
🎁
Mid-stream at point of sale
Distributor applies rebates directly at purchase. Immediate savings, no reimbursement process.
✅
Remaining claims filed
Any non-mid-stream rebates submitted as utility claims. STS tracks and manages through payment.
By the Numbers
2,800+
Active commercial rebate programs tracked nationally
SOURCE — DSIRE database
$1.40/sqft
Average Mass Save full-stack retrofit rebate
SOURCE — Mass Save data
6-9 mo
Typical fund-cycle before annual program budgets deplete
SOURCE — Industry
Field Study
87-store regional grocer · MA, NJ, PA
Captured $2.1M in stacked utility rebates and federal IRA tax credits over 24 months — funding 100% of LED retrofit capex and 60% of refrigeration controls upgrades. The captures broke down as $940K from Mass Save, $720K from PA Act 129 EE&C programs, and $440K from federal §179D deductions.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why rebate captures depend more on timing than on project scope.
✓
Annual program budgets fund first-come applications; once depleted, programs pause until the next budget cycle resets.
✓
Pre-approval is required by ~80% of utility programs — equipment installed before approval is typically ineligible.
✓
Custom rebate calculations require an engineering analysis that the utility's evaluator must validate before release.
✓
Federal IRA credits stack with utility rebates without offset; the §179D deduction stacks again where applicable.
✓
Late-Q4 captures occasionally see emergency reallocation when programs have unspent budget heading into year-end.
Your Incentive Estimate
Based on equipment & utility
HVAC Age14 years (qualifies)
Utility TerritoryConEd / National Grid
Est. Available$15,000–$35,000
Actual capture confirmed after full incentive assessment. STS guarantees results before any project commitment.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
DSIRE — the federally-funded incentive database maintained at NCSU — tracks 2,800+ active commercial utility programs nationwide, plus federal IRA tax credits and state-level incentives. Programs vary widely by utility territory and run on hard annual budgets that deplete partway through each fiscal year.
Most rebates fall into three families: prescriptive (fixed $/unit for specific equipment like LED tubes or VFD drives), custom (engineered savings calculations for non-standard projects), and performance-based (paid against measured savings over multiple years). Mass Save in Massachusetts pays up to $1.40/sqft across full-stack retrofits. PA Act 129 funds programs through PECO, Duquesne, PPL, and FirstEnergy at slightly lower density.
Federal incentives stack on top of utility rebates without offset in most cases. The IRA's §179D commercial buildings deduction allows up to $5/sqft for qualifying retrofits; §48 ITC provides a 30% credit for solar and storage. Pre-approval before equipment purchase is required by most utility programs — a common reason captures fail.
STS maps every available utility, state, and federal incentive to your equipment profile and planned upgrades.
📋
Pre-approvals filed
STS files pre-approval applications before purchase to lock in incentive rates.
🎁
Mid-stream at point of sale
Distributor applies rebates directly at purchase. Immediate savings, no reimbursement process.
✅
Remaining claims filed
Any non-mid-stream rebates submitted as utility claims. STS tracks and manages through payment.
By the Numbers
2,800+
Active commercial rebate programs tracked nationally
SOURCE — DSIRE database
$1.40/sqft
Average Mass Save full-stack retrofit rebate
SOURCE — Mass Save data
6-9 mo
Typical fund-cycle before annual program budgets deplete
SOURCE — Industry
Field Study
87-store regional grocer · MA, NJ, PA
Captured $2.1M in stacked utility rebates and federal IRA tax credits over 24 months — funding 100% of LED retrofit capex and 60% of refrigeration controls upgrades. The captures broke down as $940K from Mass Save, $720K from PA Act 129 EE&C programs, and $440K from federal §179D deductions.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why rebate captures depend more on timing than on project scope.
✓
Annual program budgets fund first-come applications; once depleted, programs pause until the next budget cycle resets.
✓
Pre-approval is required by ~80% of utility programs — equipment installed before approval is typically ineligible.
✓
Custom rebate calculations require an engineering analysis that the utility's evaluator must validate before release.
✓
Federal IRA credits stack with utility rebates without offset; the §179D deduction stacks again where applicable.
✓
Late-Q4 captures occasionally see emergency reallocation when programs have unspent budget heading into year-end.
Your Incentive Estimate
Based on equipment & utility
HVAC Age14 years (qualifies)
Utility TerritoryConEd / National Grid
Est. Available$15,000–$35,000
Actual capture confirmed after full incentive assessment. STS guarantees results before any project commitment.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
Full incentive assessment completed January 2025. HVAC replacement rebates applied at point of sale across 3 sites ($8,200 captured). LED retrofit and BMS controls applications filed with ConEd and National Grid.
Current Performance
HVAC rebates fully captured. LED ($10,800) and controls ($6,200) applications in standard utility review — expected May 2025.
Next Steps
Utility rebate checks expected May 2025. Phase 2 incentive assessment Q3 2025 to identify remaining opportunities.
Mid-Stream & Utility Programs · Active
Rebates & Incentives — Active
HVAC Captured · LED & Controls Pending
Captured to Date
$18,400
Applications Pending
$16,800
Total Identified
$35,200
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
Full incentive assessment completed January 2025. HVAC replacement rebates applied at point of sale across 3 sites ($8,200 captured). LED retrofit and BMS controls applications filed with ConEd and National Grid.
Current Performance
HVAC rebates fully captured. LED ($10,800) and controls ($6,200) applications in standard utility review — expected May 2025.
Next Steps
Utility rebate checks expected May 2025. Phase 2 incentive assessment Q3 2025 to identify remaining opportunities.
Mid-Stream & Utility Programs · Results Ready
Rebates & Incentives — Results Ready
HVAC Captured · LED & Controls Pending
Captured to Date
$18,400
Applications Pending
$16,800
Total Identified
$35,200
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
Full incentive assessment completed January 2025. HVAC replacement rebates applied at point of sale across 3 sites ($8,200 captured). LED retrofit and BMS controls applications filed with ConEd and National Grid.
Current Performance
HVAC rebates fully captured. LED ($10,800) and controls ($6,200) applications in standard utility review — expected May 2025.
Next Steps
Utility rebate checks expected May 2025. Phase 2 incentive assessment Q3 2025 to identify remaining opportunities.
Renewable Energy Credits
Two markets, two prices, same molecule.
Voluntary RECs are bought by corporations to make Scope 2 emissions claims under GHG Protocol or SBTi pathways. Compliance RECs are purchased to satisfy state Renewable Portfolio Standards. The price spread between the two can be 100×, even though the underlying clean energy generation is identical — only the buyer and use case differ.
Voluntary national pricing has held in the $1.50-$3.00/MWh range for five years, supported by Green-e certification. Compliance markets diverge sharply. NJ Class I SRECs (carved out for solar) trade at roughly $212/MWh, protected by the state's Solar Alternative Compliance Payment ceiling. MA Class I RECs trade at ~$36/MWh. PA AEPS Tier 1 settles around $7.50/MWh.
For corporate procurement, the relevant question is which framework the disclosure target requires. CDP, SBTi, and GHG Protocol all accept Green-e voluntary RECs for Scope 2 "market-based" accounting. State-level compliance obligations require RECs from that state's RPS-eligible facilities. Bundled vs. unbundled, vintage rules, and additionality claims differ by program.
STS calculates total annual electricity consumption across all 12 sites.
🌍
RECs sourced
STS procures RECs from certified wind or solar projects matching your ESG preferences for geography and vintage.
✅
Certificates delivered
RECs tracked and retired in WECC or NEPOOL registry. Certificate of retirement issued for each MWh.
📊
ESG reporting ready
Full reporting package: CDP, GRI, ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, and SBTi documentation delivered.
By the Numbers
$2.10/MWh
Voluntary REC market price (national, 2025)
SOURCE — PJM-GATS
$212/MWh
NJ Class I SREC compliance market price (2025)
SOURCE — NJ BPU
Green-e
Industry standard certification for Scope 2 reporting
SOURCE — Center for Resource Solutions
Field Study
1.8M sqft logistics REIT · Multi-state portfolio
Met its Scope 2 net-zero commitment using $43K/yr of Green-e certified voluntary RECs covering 20.5M kWh of consumption — roughly 4% the cost of an equivalent on-site solar deployment. The REC bundle was accepted by the company's SBTi-validated decarbonization pathway, fulfilling investor disclosure requirements two reporting cycles ahead of schedule.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why voluntary and compliance prices diverge by 100×.
✓
Voluntary RECs are demand-driven by corporate ESG commitments; supply is essentially unconstrained.
✓
Compliance RECs are mandate-driven by state RPS rules; in-state supply is constrained, creating scarcity premiums.
✓
State Alternative Compliance Payments (ACP) set a soft price ceiling — RECs trade just below the ACP rate.
✓
Vintage matters: most disclosure frameworks require RECs from the same reporting year as the disclosure.
✓
Tracking is regional: PJM-GATS, NEPOOL-GIS, ERCOT M-RETS, WREGIS. Cross-region retirement is restricted.
Your REC Estimate
Based on portfolio consumption
Est. Annual Consumption~12,000 MWh
RECs Required (100%)12,000 RECs
Est. Annual CostMarket Rate
REC pricing varies by registry, technology, and vintage. STS provides current market pricing before any commitment.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Voluntary RECs are bought by corporations to make Scope 2 emissions claims under GHG Protocol or SBTi pathways. Compliance RECs are purchased to satisfy state Renewable Portfolio Standards. The price spread between the two can be 100×, even though the underlying clean energy generation is identical — only the buyer and use case differ.
Voluntary national pricing has held in the $1.50-$3.00/MWh range for five years, supported by Green-e certification. Compliance markets diverge sharply. NJ Class I SRECs (carved out for solar) trade at roughly $212/MWh, protected by the state's Solar Alternative Compliance Payment ceiling. MA Class I RECs trade at ~$36/MWh. PA AEPS Tier 1 settles around $7.50/MWh.
For corporate procurement, the relevant question is which framework the disclosure target requires. CDP, SBTi, and GHG Protocol all accept Green-e voluntary RECs for Scope 2 "market-based" accounting. State-level compliance obligations require RECs from that state's RPS-eligible facilities. Bundled vs. unbundled, vintage rules, and additionality claims differ by program.
STS calculates total annual electricity consumption across all 12 sites.
🌍
RECs sourced
STS procures RECs from certified wind or solar projects matching your ESG preferences for geography and vintage.
✅
Certificates delivered
RECs tracked and retired in WECC or NEPOOL registry. Certificate of retirement issued for each MWh.
📊
ESG reporting ready
Full reporting package: CDP, GRI, ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, and SBTi documentation delivered.
By the Numbers
$2.10/MWh
Voluntary REC market price (national, 2025)
SOURCE — PJM-GATS
$212/MWh
NJ Class I SREC compliance market price (2025)
SOURCE — NJ BPU
Green-e
Industry standard certification for Scope 2 reporting
SOURCE — Center for Resource Solutions
Field Study
1.8M sqft logistics REIT · Multi-state portfolio
Met its Scope 2 net-zero commitment using $43K/yr of Green-e certified voluntary RECs covering 20.5M kWh of consumption — roughly 4% the cost of an equivalent on-site solar deployment. The REC bundle was accepted by the company's SBTi-validated decarbonization pathway, fulfilling investor disclosure requirements two reporting cycles ahead of schedule.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why voluntary and compliance prices diverge by 100×.
✓
Voluntary RECs are demand-driven by corporate ESG commitments; supply is essentially unconstrained.
✓
Compliance RECs are mandate-driven by state RPS rules; in-state supply is constrained, creating scarcity premiums.
✓
State Alternative Compliance Payments (ACP) set a soft price ceiling — RECs trade just below the ACP rate.
✓
Vintage matters: most disclosure frameworks require RECs from the same reporting year as the disclosure.
✓
Tracking is regional: PJM-GATS, NEPOOL-GIS, ERCOT M-RETS, WREGIS. Cross-region retirement is restricted.
Your REC Estimate
Based on portfolio consumption
Est. Annual Consumption~12,000 MWh
RECs Required (100%)12,000 RECs
Est. Annual CostMarket Rate
REC pricing varies by registry, technology, and vintage. STS provides current market pricing before any commitment.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
2025 Vintage · WECC & NEPOOL Certified · All Frameworks
RECs Retired
12,000
Carbon Offset
5,280 tCO₂e
Coverage
100%
Program Phase
Enrolled
⏳
Program Enrolled — Data Populating
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
12,000 RECs sourced and retired — 8,400 MWh from WECC wind and 3,600 MWh from NEPOOL solar. All 2025 vintage. CDP Scope 2, GRI, ENERGY STAR, and SBTi documentation delivered.
Current Performance
100% of portfolio electricity consumption matched with certified renewable generation. 5,280 tCO₂e Scope 2 market-based carbon offset for 2025.
2025 Vintage · WECC & NEPOOL Certified · All Frameworks
RECs Retired
12,000
Carbon Offset
5,280 tCO₂e
Coverage
100%
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
12,000 RECs sourced and retired — 8,400 MWh from WECC wind and 3,600 MWh from NEPOOL solar. All 2025 vintage. CDP Scope 2, GRI, ENERGY STAR, and SBTi documentation delivered.
Current Performance
100% of portfolio electricity consumption matched with certified renewable generation. 5,280 tCO₂e Scope 2 market-based carbon offset for 2025.
2025 Vintage · WECC & NEPOOL Certified · All Frameworks
RECs Retired
12,000
Carbon Offset
5,280 tCO₂e
Coverage
100%
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
12,000 RECs sourced and retired — 8,400 MWh from WECC wind and 3,600 MWh from NEPOOL solar. All 2025 vintage. CDP Scope 2, GRI, ENERGY STAR, and SBTi documentation delivered.
Current Performance
100% of portfolio electricity consumption matched with certified renewable generation. 5,280 tCO₂e Scope 2 market-based carbon offset for 2025.
NYC, Boston, DC, Denver, Boulder, and Seattle have enacted (or scheduled) building emissions standards with legally enforceable caps and per-ton penalties. Phase 1 limits primarily catch the worst emitters; Phase 2 (typically 2030) tightens caps by 40-50% across building types.
NYC's Local Law 97 sets caps in kg CO₂e per square foot, varying by occupancy. A medical office building's Period 1 cap of 11.93 kg/sqft drops to 4.96 kg/sqft in 2030 — a 58% reduction. Penalties are $268 per metric ton CO₂e over the cap, per year. Boston BERDO 2.0 follows a similar trajectory at $234/ton; DC BEPS uses an EUI-based fine schedule.
Compliance options vary by jurisdiction. NYC allows up to 70% offset via RECs against electric emissions; Boston permits Alternative Compliance Payments. Most cities require annual benchmarking submissions in the spring. About 9% of NYC LL97-covered buildings exceeded their 2024 caps; analyses suggest roughly 57% will exceed 2030 caps without intervention.
STS calculates your exact 2024–2030 fine exposure using ENERGY STAR data and LL97 carbon intensity methodology.
🗺
Compliance pathway
STS models the most cost-effective combination of efficiency, RECs, and carbon credits for each compliance period.
🔨
Implementation
STS coordinates implementation of selected compliance measures across your NYC portfolio.
📋
Annual DOB report
STS prepares and supports submission of your annual LL97 compliance report to NYC DOB.
By the Numbers
$268/ton
NYC LL97 penalty per metric ton CO₂e over the cap
SOURCE — NYC DOB
~57%
NYC buildings projected over the 2030 (Period 2) caps
SOURCE — IMT analysis
4 yrs
Until LL97 Period 2 tightens 40-50% across building types
SOURCE — NYC LL97
Field Study
380K sqft Class A office tower · Manhattan
Was 14% over its 2024 LL97 cap — exposed to ~$680K in annual fines. After a lighting controls retrofit, HVAC retro-commissioning, and a 12,000 MWh REC purchase (LL97 allows up to 70% RECs against electric emissions), the building achieved compliance through the full Period 1 window. The retrofit financed itself within 31 months on energy savings alone, before counting avoided fines.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why early action carries dramatically lower compliance cost.
✓
Phase 1 caps (2024–29 in NYC) catch only the worst emitters; most buildings are technically compliant in the early years.
✓
Phase 2 caps (typically 2030) tighten by 40–50% — Phase 1 compliance is no guarantee of Phase 2 compliance.
✓
Penalties are calculated annually as ($/ton CO₂e) × tons over cap; fines compound year over year if uncorrected.
✓
RECs may offset electric emissions (up to 70% in NYC) but don't help with stationary fuel (gas) emissions.
✓
Multi-city portfolios face parallel obligations: NYC LL97, Boston BERDO, and DC BEPS each have different rules.
Your Exposure Estimate
Based on NYC portfolio
Portfolio Sq Ft (NYC)~800,000 sq ft
Estimated 2024 Fine RiskSignificant
Compliance PathwayAssessment Required
Fine exposure calculated after full LL97 assessment using your actual utility data and ENERGY STAR benchmarking.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
NYC, Boston, DC, Denver, Boulder, and Seattle have enacted (or scheduled) building emissions standards with legally enforceable caps and per-ton penalties. Phase 1 limits primarily catch the worst emitters; Phase 2 (typically 2030) tightens caps by 40-50% across building types.
NYC's Local Law 97 sets caps in kg CO₂e per square foot, varying by occupancy. A medical office building's Period 1 cap of 11.93 kg/sqft drops to 4.96 kg/sqft in 2030 — a 58% reduction. Penalties are $268 per metric ton CO₂e over the cap, per year. Boston BERDO 2.0 follows a similar trajectory at $234/ton; DC BEPS uses an EUI-based fine schedule.
Compliance options vary by jurisdiction. NYC allows up to 70% offset via RECs against electric emissions; Boston permits Alternative Compliance Payments. Most cities require annual benchmarking submissions in the spring. About 9% of NYC LL97-covered buildings exceeded their 2024 caps; analyses suggest roughly 57% will exceed 2030 caps without intervention.
STS calculates your exact 2024–2030 fine exposure using ENERGY STAR data and LL97 carbon intensity methodology.
🗺
Compliance pathway
STS models the most cost-effective combination of efficiency, RECs, and carbon credits for each compliance period.
🔨
Implementation
STS coordinates implementation of selected compliance measures across your NYC portfolio.
📋
Annual DOB report
STS prepares and supports submission of your annual LL97 compliance report to NYC DOB.
By the Numbers
$268/ton
NYC LL97 penalty per metric ton CO₂e over the cap
SOURCE — NYC DOB
~57%
NYC buildings projected over the 2030 (Period 2) caps
SOURCE — IMT analysis
4 yrs
Until LL97 Period 2 tightens 40-50% across building types
SOURCE — NYC LL97
Field Study
380K sqft Class A office tower · Manhattan
Was 14% over its 2024 LL97 cap — exposed to ~$680K in annual fines. After a lighting controls retrofit, HVAC retro-commissioning, and a 12,000 MWh REC purchase (LL97 allows up to 70% RECs against electric emissions), the building achieved compliance through the full Period 1 window. The retrofit financed itself within 31 months on energy savings alone, before counting avoided fines.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why early action carries dramatically lower compliance cost.
✓
Phase 1 caps (2024–29 in NYC) catch only the worst emitters; most buildings are technically compliant in the early years.
✓
Phase 2 caps (typically 2030) tighten by 40–50% — Phase 1 compliance is no guarantee of Phase 2 compliance.
✓
Penalties are calculated annually as ($/ton CO₂e) × tons over cap; fines compound year over year if uncorrected.
✓
RECs may offset electric emissions (up to 70% in NYC) but don't help with stationary fuel (gas) emissions.
✓
Multi-city portfolios face parallel obligations: NYC LL97, Boston BERDO, and DC BEPS each have different rules.
Your Exposure Estimate
Based on NYC portfolio
Portfolio Sq Ft (NYC)~800,000 sq ft
Estimated 2024 Fine RiskSignificant
Compliance PathwayAssessment Required
Fine exposure calculated after full LL97 assessment using your actual utility data and ENERGY STAR benchmarking.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
Full LL97 assessment complete. 4 of 6 NYC buildings below their 2024 carbon cap. 2 at-risk buildings under active remediation with efficiency measures and market-based RECs applied.
Current Performance
Both at-risk buildings projected to reach compliance before May 2025 DOB deadline. Portfolio-wide emissions 22% below 2019 baseline.
Next Steps
Annual LL97 compliance report due May 2025 — STS preparing all documentation. 2025 period monitoring ongoing.
BPS Compliance & LL97 · Active
Building Performance Standards — Active
2024 Compliance Period · NYC LL97 · 6 Buildings
Buildings Compliant
4 of 6
Emissions Reduction
22%
Fine Exposure Avoided
$268K+
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
Full LL97 assessment complete. 4 of 6 NYC buildings below their 2024 carbon cap. 2 at-risk buildings under active remediation with efficiency measures and market-based RECs applied.
Current Performance
Both at-risk buildings projected to reach compliance before May 2025 DOB deadline. Portfolio-wide emissions 22% below 2019 baseline.
Next Steps
Annual LL97 compliance report due May 2025 — STS preparing all documentation. 2025 period monitoring ongoing.
BPS Compliance & LL97 · Results Ready
Building Performance Standards — Results Ready
2024 Compliance Period · NYC LL97 · 6 Buildings
Buildings Compliant
4 of 6
Emissions Reduction
22%
Fine Exposure Avoided
$268K+
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
Full LL97 assessment complete. 4 of 6 NYC buildings below their 2024 carbon cap. 2 at-risk buildings under active remediation with efficiency measures and market-based RECs applied.
Current Performance
Both at-risk buildings projected to reach compliance before May 2025 DOB deadline. Portfolio-wide emissions 22% below 2019 baseline.
Next Steps
Annual LL97 compliance report due May 2025 — STS preparing all documentation. 2025 period monitoring ongoing.
ESG & Sustainability
Which frameworks matter, and to whom.
Voluntary disclosure frameworks drive investor and B2B procurement decisions. CDP processes ~24,000 annual climate disclosures globally and feeds the most widely-used investor ESG ratings. SBTi validates corporate emissions reduction targets against IPCC 1.5°C pathways; roughly 8,000 companies have committed. TCFD/ISSB defines climate risk disclosure architecture used by financial regulators. GHG Protocol provides the underlying inventory methodology all three frameworks rely on.
Mandatory frameworks vary by jurisdiction. The EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) applies to roughly 50,000 companies, including US subsidiaries with EU revenue above €150M. The UK, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada have adopted TCFD-aligned mandatory disclosure. The US SEC's domestic climate rule remains stayed pending litigation, but California's SB 253 and SB 261 impose Scope 1+2+3 disclosure on companies with >$1B revenue doing business in the state.
For most multi-site operators, the practical question is converting utility billing and metering data into the inventory format each framework requires. Scope 2 is the simplest (purchased electricity, market-based or location-based methodology). Scope 1 covers stationary combustion (natural gas) and mobile sources. Scope 3 — supply chain and downstream emissions — is where most reporting effort lives, and is increasingly demanded by procurement teams at Fortune 500 buyers.
STS calculates Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions from your utility data using CDP and GRI compliant methodology.
⭐
ENERGY STAR Benchmarking
All eligible buildings benchmarked. Certification applications filed for buildings scoring 75+.
🗺
Carbon Roadmap
STS models the impact of every available measure on your footprint and sets SBTi-aligned targets.
📋
Disclosure Package
CDP, GRI, TCFD, and SFDR disclosure packages prepared and delivered board-ready.
By the Numbers
24,000+
Corporations reporting annually to CDP (climate disclosure)
SOURCE — CDP 2024 disclosure
8,000+
Companies with SBTi-validated reduction targets
SOURCE — SBTi registry
CSRD
EU rule applying to 50,000+ companies (incl. US subs)
SOURCE — European Commission
Field Study
Mid-cap industrial · 73-site footprint
Engaged STS to build out a Scope 1+2 inventory across the full portfolio. Year-1 outcome: CDP rating B (vs. C-minus baseline), an SBTi commitment registered with a 1.5°C-aligned pathway, and 2 RFP wins with Fortune 100 procurement teams that required ESG disclosure in their vendor onboarding flow. The disclosure infrastructure paid for itself many times over in year-1 contract revenue alone.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why each framework asks for the same data in different formats.
✓
GHG Protocol defines the underlying methodology (Scope 1, 2, 3); all major frameworks reference this baseline.
✓
CDP scores submitters on an A–F scale; investor ESG ratings (MSCI, Sustainalytics) cite CDP scores directly.
✓
SBTi validates targets, not emissions — it's a public commitment to a 1.5°C-aligned trajectory, not an audit.
✓
TCFD/ISSB focuses on financial risk disclosure; the same Scope 1+2+3 numbers feed climate risk modeling.
✓
Mandatory frameworks (CSRD, California SB 253) typically require third-party assurance; voluntary frameworks accept self-reported.
Your ESG Profile
Based on portfolio data
ENERGY STAR Score72 / 100
Certification Threshold75+ (3 pts away)
FrameworksCDP + GRI + SBTi
Full ESG assessment confirms exact scope of reporting, target setting, and framework alignment required.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Voluntary disclosure frameworks drive investor and B2B procurement decisions. CDP processes ~24,000 annual climate disclosures globally and feeds the most widely-used investor ESG ratings. SBTi validates corporate emissions reduction targets against IPCC 1.5°C pathways; roughly 8,000 companies have committed. TCFD/ISSB defines climate risk disclosure architecture used by financial regulators. GHG Protocol provides the underlying inventory methodology all three frameworks rely on.
Mandatory frameworks vary by jurisdiction. The EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) applies to roughly 50,000 companies, including US subsidiaries with EU revenue above €150M. The UK, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada have adopted TCFD-aligned mandatory disclosure. The US SEC's domestic climate rule remains stayed pending litigation, but California's SB 253 and SB 261 impose Scope 1+2+3 disclosure on companies with >$1B revenue doing business in the state.
For most multi-site operators, the practical question is converting utility billing and metering data into the inventory format each framework requires. Scope 2 is the simplest (purchased electricity, market-based or location-based methodology). Scope 1 covers stationary combustion (natural gas) and mobile sources. Scope 3 — supply chain and downstream emissions — is where most reporting effort lives, and is increasingly demanded by procurement teams at Fortune 500 buyers.
STS calculates Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions from your utility data using CDP and GRI compliant methodology.
⭐
ENERGY STAR Benchmarking
All eligible buildings benchmarked. Certification applications filed for buildings scoring 75+.
🗺
Carbon Roadmap
STS models the impact of every available measure on your footprint and sets SBTi-aligned targets.
📋
Disclosure Package
CDP, GRI, TCFD, and SFDR disclosure packages prepared and delivered board-ready.
By the Numbers
24,000+
Corporations reporting annually to CDP (climate disclosure)
SOURCE — CDP 2024 disclosure
8,000+
Companies with SBTi-validated reduction targets
SOURCE — SBTi registry
CSRD
EU rule applying to 50,000+ companies (incl. US subs)
SOURCE — European Commission
Field Study
Mid-cap industrial · 73-site footprint
Engaged STS to build out a Scope 1+2 inventory across the full portfolio. Year-1 outcome: CDP rating B (vs. C-minus baseline), an SBTi commitment registered with a 1.5°C-aligned pathway, and 2 RFP wins with Fortune 100 procurement teams that required ESG disclosure in their vendor onboarding flow. The disclosure infrastructure paid for itself many times over in year-1 contract revenue alone.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why each framework asks for the same data in different formats.
✓
GHG Protocol defines the underlying methodology (Scope 1, 2, 3); all major frameworks reference this baseline.
✓
CDP scores submitters on an A–F scale; investor ESG ratings (MSCI, Sustainalytics) cite CDP scores directly.
✓
SBTi validates targets, not emissions — it's a public commitment to a 1.5°C-aligned trajectory, not an audit.
✓
TCFD/ISSB focuses on financial risk disclosure; the same Scope 1+2+3 numbers feed climate risk modeling.
✓
Mandatory frameworks (CSRD, California SB 253) typically require third-party assurance; voluntary frameworks accept self-reported.
Your ESG Profile
Based on portfolio data
ENERGY STAR Score72 / 100
Certification Threshold75+ (3 pts away)
FrameworksCDP + GRI + SBTi
Full ESG assessment confirms exact scope of reporting, target setting, and framework alignment required.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
CDP B– reflects strong Scope 1 and 2 data. STS targeting B+ for 2025 with enhanced Scope 3 data and TCFD climate risk assessment. ENERGY STAR score 3 points from certification.
Next Steps
ENERGY STAR certification application Q3 2025. CDP 2025 preparation begins Q4 2025 for March 2026 submission.
Reporting & Carbon Roadmap · Active
ESG & Sustainability Strategy — Active
2025 Active · CDP Filed · SBTi Committed · ENERGY STAR Benchmarked
CDP B– reflects strong Scope 1 and 2 data. STS targeting B+ for 2025 with enhanced Scope 3 data and TCFD climate risk assessment. ENERGY STAR score 3 points from certification.
Next Steps
ENERGY STAR certification application Q3 2025. CDP 2025 preparation begins Q4 2025 for March 2026 submission.
Reporting & Carbon Roadmap · Results Ready
ESG & Sustainability Strategy — Results Ready
2025 Active · CDP Filed · SBTi Committed · ENERGY STAR Benchmarked
ENERGY STAR Score
72/100
Carbon Reduction
18% vs. 2019
CDP Score
B–
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
CDP B– reflects strong Scope 1 and 2 data. STS targeting B+ for 2025 with enhanced Scope 3 data and TCFD climate risk assessment. ENERGY STAR score 3 points from certification.
Next Steps
ENERGY STAR certification application Q3 2025. CDP 2025 preparation begins Q4 2025 for March 2026 submission.
Energy Efficiency · EaaS
Why building age determines your savings ceiling.
Energy code adoption varies materially by state. California, New York, Massachusetts, and Washington adopt ASHRAE 90.1 updates within 1-2 years of publication. Buildings constructed under ASHRAE 90.1-2007 or earlier — common across the South and Plains — typically have 30-45% achievable savings versus current code, just from bringing systems up to modern standards.
The largest wins usually come from four areas: lighting (LED retrofits with networked controls capture 50-70% lighting energy reduction), HVAC controls (BAS upgrades, demand-controlled ventilation, optimized scheduling), envelope (air sealing, attic insulation, window film for older glazing), and retro-commissioning (fixing what was installed wrong or has drifted over time). Each measure has its own simple payback range.
Energy-as-a-Service (EaaS) structures convert these projects from capex to opex by financing against the savings stream itself. STS retains ownership of upgraded equipment for a contractual term (typically 7-10 years), the building owner pays only a portion of realized savings, and ownership transfers at end of term. The structure eliminates the upfront capital barrier that historically blocked smaller portfolios from comprehensive retrofits.
ASHRAE Level 1 audit at priority sites. Identifies and quantifies every efficiency opportunity.
📋
EaaS Proposal
STS presents savings estimate, project scope, and EaaS terms. Full detail before commitment.
🔨
Turnkey Installation
STS manages all procurement, contractor coordination, and installation. No project management from your team.
📈
M&V & Reporting
Monthly savings verification per IPMVP. Annual performance reports delivered to your team.
By the Numbers
30-45%
Achievable savings vs ASHRAE 90.1-2007 or older baseline
SOURCE — DOE Better Buildings
$0/capex
Typical EaaS structure; STS finances against shared savings
SOURCE — EaaS model
7-10 yrs
Typical EaaS contract term; client owns at end
SOURCE — Industry
Field Study
4-property hotel portfolio · PA, OH, IL
All built to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 baseline. Executed an EaaS retrofit covering LED, BAS controls, HVAC retro-commissioning, and envelope air sealing. 31% annual energy reduction · annual savings $312K. STS financed 100% of capex via the shared savings agreement; ownership transfers to the operator after year 8. Year-1 IRR after STS share: 14.6%.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why EaaS converts efficiency from capital risk to vendor responsibility.
✓
The vendor finances and installs upgrades; customer pays only a portion of measured savings, cash flow positive from day one.
✓
Performance is measured under IPMVP — against a weather-normalized baseline that locks in pre-retrofit consumption patterns.
✓
The vendor carries the savings shortfall risk: underperformance reduces vendor compensation proportionally.
✓
Equipment ownership transfers to the building owner at end of term (typically 7–10 years), retaining residual asset value.
✓
Bundled retrofits compound: lighting + controls + HVAC commissioning produce more savings than the sum of measures alone.
Your Efficiency Opportunity
Based on portfolio profile
HVAC Age14 years (high priority)
LED OpportunityMultiple sites
Est. Annual SavingsAssessment Required
Actual savings potential confirmed after ASHRAE Level 1 audit. STS guarantees results before any project commitment.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Energy code adoption varies materially by state. California, New York, Massachusetts, and Washington adopt ASHRAE 90.1 updates within 1-2 years of publication. Buildings constructed under ASHRAE 90.1-2007 or earlier — common across the South and Plains — typically have 30-45% achievable savings versus current code, just from bringing systems up to modern standards.
The largest wins usually come from four areas: lighting (LED retrofits with networked controls capture 50-70% lighting energy reduction), HVAC controls (BAS upgrades, demand-controlled ventilation, optimized scheduling), envelope (air sealing, attic insulation, window film for older glazing), and retro-commissioning (fixing what was installed wrong or has drifted over time). Each measure has its own simple payback range.
Energy-as-a-Service (EaaS) structures convert these projects from capex to opex by financing against the savings stream itself. STS retains ownership of upgraded equipment for a contractual term (typically 7-10 years), the building owner pays only a portion of realized savings, and ownership transfers at end of term. The structure eliminates the upfront capital barrier that historically blocked smaller portfolios from comprehensive retrofits.
ASHRAE Level 1 audit at priority sites. Identifies and quantifies every efficiency opportunity.
📋
EaaS Proposal
STS presents savings estimate, project scope, and EaaS terms. Full detail before commitment.
🔨
Turnkey Installation
STS manages all procurement, contractor coordination, and installation. No project management from your team.
📈
M&V & Reporting
Monthly savings verification per IPMVP. Annual performance reports delivered to your team.
By the Numbers
30-45%
Achievable savings vs ASHRAE 90.1-2007 or older baseline
SOURCE — DOE Better Buildings
$0/capex
Typical EaaS structure; STS finances against shared savings
SOURCE — EaaS model
7-10 yrs
Typical EaaS contract term; client owns at end
SOURCE — Industry
Field Study
4-property hotel portfolio · PA, OH, IL
All built to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 baseline. Executed an EaaS retrofit covering LED, BAS controls, HVAC retro-commissioning, and envelope air sealing. 31% annual energy reduction · annual savings $312K. STS financed 100% of capex via the shared savings agreement; ownership transfers to the operator after year 8. Year-1 IRR after STS share: 14.6%.
REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOME — STS engagement model
Why It Works
Why EaaS converts efficiency from capital risk to vendor responsibility.
✓
The vendor finances and installs upgrades; customer pays only a portion of measured savings, cash flow positive from day one.
✓
Performance is measured under IPMVP — against a weather-normalized baseline that locks in pre-retrofit consumption patterns.
✓
The vendor carries the savings shortfall risk: underperformance reduces vendor compensation proportionally.
✓
Equipment ownership transfers to the building owner at end of term (typically 7–10 years), retaining residual asset value.
✓
Bundled retrofits compound: lighting + controls + HVAC commissioning produce more savings than the sum of measures alone.
Your Efficiency Opportunity
Based on portfolio profile
HVAC Age14 years (high priority)
LED OpportunityMultiple sites
Est. Annual SavingsAssessment Required
Actual savings potential confirmed after ASHRAE Level 1 audit. STS guarantees results before any project commitment.
Ready to get started?
Contact your account manager to begin enrollment or request a detailed assessment.
Your program is active and STS is managing it on your behalf. Live results will appear here as the program progresses.
What STS Has Done
ASHRAE Level 2 audit completed January 2025. LED retrofit and HVAC replacement at 4 sites complete. 84-month EaaS term began May 2025. M&V per IPMVP Option B — savings verified monthly.
Current Performance
Month 8 M&V confirms 62% energy savings vs. pre-retrofit baseline — $148,000 annualized, within 3% of projection. All 4 sites at or above the guaranteed savings threshold.
Next Steps
Year 1 M&V report May 2026. EaaS expansion to 8 remaining sites available — STS can audit and add to current term.
Efficiency-as-a-Service · Active
Energy Efficiency — EaaS — Active
Month 8 of 84 · LED & HVAC · 4 Sites · M&V Active
Energy Saved
62%
Annual Savings
$148,000
CO₂ Reduced
86 tCO₂e/yr
Program Phase
Active
What STS Has Done
ASHRAE Level 2 audit completed January 2025. LED retrofit and HVAC replacement at 4 sites complete. 84-month EaaS term began May 2025. M&V per IPMVP Option B — savings verified monthly.
Current Performance
Month 8 M&V confirms 62% energy savings vs. pre-retrofit baseline — $148,000 annualized, within 3% of projection. All 4 sites at or above the guaranteed savings threshold.
Next Steps
Year 1 M&V report May 2026. EaaS expansion to 8 remaining sites available — STS can audit and add to current term.
Efficiency-as-a-Service · Results Ready
Energy Efficiency — EaaS — Results Ready
Month 8 of 84 · LED & HVAC · 4 Sites · M&V Active
Energy Saved
62%
Annual Savings
$148,000
CO₂ Reduced
86 tCO₂e/yr
Program Phase
Results Ready
✅
Results Complete — Full Report Available
Program concluded. Download your full results report or contact your rep to discuss renewal.
What STS Has Done
ASHRAE Level 2 audit completed January 2025. LED retrofit and HVAC replacement at 4 sites complete. 84-month EaaS term began May 2025. M&V per IPMVP Option B — savings verified monthly.
Current Performance
Month 8 M&V confirms 62% energy savings vs. pre-retrofit baseline — $148,000 annualized, within 3% of projection. All 4 sites at or above the guaranteed savings threshold.
Next Steps
Year 1 M&V report May 2026. EaaS expansion to 8 remaining sites available — STS can audit and add to current term.
Edit Client
Update account details to personalize this dashboard